X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+H9INF0DWPGaXFX7ET/RQ7nxis1OTXOBUupksLZvUoI=; b=lTINTznNhTO+/IzKwUIOl6L0dmSalQOev/Zk4ur6rXn35CxJx3+/6sFxqeB/nCW8m2 sHO8swN3Q5dPq95iKSEqcpDdVLDuBZiBYL6ro1qo9ERQUSogZ6Ky7QylCPMMNN9GMI8q x640biXbaV1+9j3rtdzEaqWzRMCefSdFQHUuplKg7cV9qNYm6lsIMHR6+m+RyGVDoJFY suGMKQgUgtTjpClaPcC+fuVAAxKHlWLD6RKzByyPK6aAOPHKCva7DzCVkNtfQ6geQc5s mCYB1+hK5kQ6a7ZmKl583Y+GrFFAty8a5+iTegUbAw8agOJqcC+YrfwsU3M927t9366Z f8vQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.147.232 with SMTP id tn8mr12616856lbb.84.1444139109312; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:45:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56135E15.6000007@neurotica.com> References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <56133B15 DOT 6020402 AT neurotica DOT com> <56134243 DOT 3060203 AT neurotica DOT com> <56135E15 DOT 6000007 AT neurotica DOT com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:45:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 10/06/2015 12:07 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >>> list in the past several weeks are accomplishing little other than >>> proving that there can be no consensus here. >>> >>> Personally I treat this a bit like the existence of "goto" in C: It is >>> never, ever intended to actually be used in code. It is a "sign post". >> >> Do you have any reference on this? I mean a quote from the guys who >> actually developed C and added goto in the first place? Or is is just >> your guess? > > A "reference"? No, but your attempt to dismiss it as a "guess" will > fail. I hate name-dropping, so I won't drop any names. > > It was presented to me as an opinion by a mentor and former employer > of mine a long time ago, as he was teaching me the basics of C. Perhaps > we can call that an "educated guess". ~30 years of C programming later, > I've taken that opinion as my own. Perhaps we can call that an > "experienced guess". So, during this conversation: > > http://www.neurotica.com/misc/DSC_0193.JPG > > ...I asked "one of the guys who actually developed C" about it and he > concurred, with a hearty laugh. Respect. > Close enough? > > -Dave > > -- > Dave McGuire, AK4HZ > New Kensington, PA > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/