X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: I do not consent to surveillance, prick X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; s=default; t=1444100885; bh=pYJXcfYaZdNwSonparNVfbfAa8Tw5oBGuV63zWPCF8c=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=C5FOmvKxfMX7KG/fqz16NBTYm2TXTUAlW+GixSpx1XdEuQ0qPia2/5uAWWjhcl7Jq uQww9YVfpo9ksZQCUWK8Z0e3vn4TCpTP+DGcRJmlYySE/uBEAV59Q6zP7KV4dK3Z/5 8fy158DqXVJh/cIgAvI1Rd8HeOUtATw8/MjP7U0Q= Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> From: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <56133B15.6020402@neurotica.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:08:05 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 10/05/2015 10:40 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> *sigh* >> >> There are, shall we say, "interesting" perceptions of what the user >> base wants on this list. Interesting bordering on the creative, in fact. >> >> What the user base wants is some progress on usability, bug fixes, and >> a release interval not measured in years. The user base does *not* want >> either scripting or primary development done in some dweeb's pet >> language from the fringes of fanboy hackerdom that nobody else has ever >> heard of. And the user base most certainly doesn't want YET ANOTHER >> FORK that nobody but the author will ever see. >> >> -Dave, sick to death of this zero-productivity list traffic > > The forks could lead to productivity if someone choose to "anti fork" > them back to the mainline? I agree, and I think that would be great. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA