X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pCR1QpL6fyLPXc8MfH3Xa27kkYmQkIT4r7BmmkduNIo=; b=coeRR4KheBUGXpO3KBlypCi8lUZg3r0Vm+kj9prig/1AtkuZ3kCB5SAkpIAoRu0iHp mlSyeM4mAOkzJ0vbv5C/pAIdNgsr1HrzmRdjpNfDpT78BSMcgnh4qSfUa+MNw3oY2pC+ 4t8st4UZnSxmpxHiUYdqIIZ6KPZWQRWQQxYA/r4fYTrTbK2rkqUnfAijC3jqUQrYMG3U mXEFP93p8QHVNoRh6KxMxUV5sJhjXSchej2ziPnlRYyC3NbEJxSLHlGGeboPJeefnM6X 8STSPph/dJZImoiwJZja+/cnJRUlUJlgSIGrDKQXst76PXPH7ehw33P4XJNrF5chMQ11 7pZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.63.67 with SMTP id e3mr13202977lbs.92.1444099213450; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:40:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56133047.7030402@neurotica.com> References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 02:40:13 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 10/05/2015 10:03 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >> I recommend the same process to happen for pcb and gschem. If there's >> literally noone who has the time and will to sit down and code push & >> shove, it just won't happen, no matter how formally you vote. On the >> other hand if you ignore what the user base wants, you end up with dead >> ends like guile/scheme in gschem. > > *sigh* > > There are, shall we say, "interesting" perceptions of what the user > base wants on this list. Interesting bordering on the creative, in fact. > > What the user base wants is some progress on usability, bug fixes, and > a release interval not measured in years. The user base does *not* want > either scripting or primary development done in some dweeb's pet > language from the fringes of fanboy hackerdom that nobody else has ever > heard of. And the user base most certainly doesn't want YET ANOTHER > FORK that nobody but the author will ever see. > > -Dave, sick to death of this zero-productivity list traffic The forks could lead to productivity if someone choose to "anti fork" them back to the mainline? > -- > Dave McGuire, AK4HZ > New Kensington, PA > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/