X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PQQDwEutFv1gAStMFBlXRtkAMkg8o4Lqr8hxo6jzzGo=; b=tvhbqpfrTPI160p0ls/jsC4dlUgRvmti2MHCTECjJsuV3bsLsu7RVXLsW5nvG6Wktm ZgnhhYTQAeN801a5H6idX9iWcCPtF4UdM/FgdK3Jr7Ymgbc3inXh2ESru5NtdmpFSg7g uvLwneLnnYofraNo0XSawezqY5ETuMiN8tFbqCgy9QMYPB0hdwo6mN29RqjFqkzJFNri ZlND5qIzlcnR3qXSqd7YKUgdXKtNnKEZkuCArPWe86a466/QTCkCU4eas/jwQnFgF7Lc RmHY1kVEuFqKbLwSjZ6rh5mDuH+2wje9fVFdto82aRodRuxgycpqe5ZM44JHZmVL6IsD lzNQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.134.73 with SMTP id pi9mr13035599lbb.83.1444093413577; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:03:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:03:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t9613cNU007854 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Stefan Salewski wrote: > >> The real hard part is, that people really do not like autorouters >> generally, > > I don't like auto routers which fail on my boards ;-) > My biggest concern with what the toporouter could demonstrably do is that > it is/was a game of all or nothing. You could not tell the router to > restrict itself to some routes picked by me. And more troublesome, it was > not able to play nice with tracks and vias already put in place by me. > Both are hard deal breakers for me. The problem has 2 parts 1. People who do layout keep all kinds of information in their heads that never makes it onto a schematic. 2. There are compromises that you can make in layout that are not always obvious when you are making the schematic. >> and most really do not like curved traces. >> Anthony already wrote that most people told him that. > > Well, I remember quite some "awsome!" shouts on the list every time the > toporouter produced some new results. Yea I was one of those. I still think it is cool. > We did not do a poll on whether people like or dislike topo router style > traces back then. And Igors2 question was in no way a proper poll on > peoples priorities for the direction of future development, either. A lot of them also involved the puller which curved stuff. >> They seem to like push and shove much better. >> So I have no real hope that more than about five people would use the >> router, even if it would work fine. > > My prophecy: If you can fix the two issues I mentioned above, people will > start to test and love your toporouter. And soon curvy shaped tracks will > be hallmark of boards done with geda. I like that but I find it unlikely. > ---<)kaimartin(>--- > -- > Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 > Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 > Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de > GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get > > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/