X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Q1nraJ0rgkvRXpy3g3UfSrAcAHTf/3wQ68POFkX4JTA=;
        b=Ydr09xTvVdLAEHDbxyJ7m+aiks//jzjnixR/aY3YoDikkld6wMYplb1+Q15iQzXa9H
         FglsOC0eauWq3GBp0WT+9UA01hMVZPbfOL0YRGNKtbsSHOj8aUas8/NbhQDrXLa59i35
         X2Fh6MjgsWhEmzImnVyNMwVTOOdC5ga9n4WJ21Uwjb6JHJ0Tw2N8jv2kFNCkiQ7YvOgh
         fQJgHZesSjxjkKyJqwse+rdae6m2Woev6yPdfljRyakhPhqN+guwCBxh1wvgEas/Jqah
         MEb+po3KyPtSZySOx5pdBZIT9mA5sIGntVAL2JDnbvZNVcFs3e1K1eDEcIoNqyWIhZz+
         Wd1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.63.67 with SMTP id e3mr10064258lbs.92.1443998304062;
 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC4O8c8zeA5dVHV3dOOZhfUqATATDt2cGMKbdKnF3sMur_ECpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAM2RGhSuaNy3PQ7CJJjTbzTM6TckNGRShobchRj42Vk10ixPGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510040356140 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhTM_0ER8Vr_RwOOEfjf+vLZez0wV3xQU2Bg+6+Ovhc0ww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510040516110 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c8zeA5dVHV3dOOZhfUqATATDt2cGMKbdKnF3sMur_ECpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 22:38:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhQZd7vVLDz2N2nCPWsqgZFsF_Fjsgccn1PYBg9KZYZjng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Britton Kerin
(britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:22 PM, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:48 AM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
>>>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Igor2 is off working on something using SDL because it is maintained
>>>>> but has a slower release cycle. The logical reason being that we don't
>>>>> really care about new gtk functionality but we have to burn time
>>>>> fixing things for each major gtk release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SPOLIER ALERT: I am not talking about gschem or pcb here; I don't say
>>>> any of
>>>> the geda tools should or should not use gtk. I just share my personal
>>>> opinion about using gtk in general. I won't respond to text that ignores
>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think GTK is a bad idea long term (for any application), and it's
>>>> not
>>>> qt that'd solve this. My resoning goes:
>>>
>>>
>>> Google would agree with you they dumped it.
>>>
>>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/03/12/0147256/google-to-replace-gtk-with-its-own-aura-in-chrome
>>
>>
>> Nice!
>>
>>>> - GTK doesn't look native on anything else than gnome. Most other
>>>> toolkits
>>>> have the same property: native only on one or on a few systems. So using
>>>> anything else doesn't make this worse or better. (If an app wants to
>>>> look
>>>> native on multiple platforms, it needs multiple native GUI frontends,
>>>> one
>>>> for each platform.)
>>>
>>>
>>> MATE is actively developed and based on GTK2 (migrating slowly to
>>> GTK3) because the users and developers like GNOME2 and hated using
>>> OpenGL for everything the way GNOME3 does.
>>
>>
>> SDL2 does this cleverly: you can chose, per window, to use software
>> rendering or acceleration, when you create the window. There are drawing
>> primitives that are compatible with both. I will make it possible for the
>> user to switch between sw rendering, hw accel and auto-select (default) at
>> application startup-time.
>>
>>>
>>> I said earlier on the geda-developers list that a good blue sky
>>> project would be giving geda a way to have multiple GUI's like pcb
>>> does with hid.
>>
>>
>> I second that. PCB benefits from having HIDs - not only because it makes
>> it easier to add a new HID, but I believe it made the code better by
>> inserting an API between the engine and the UI. I believe gschem could
>> benefit the same way.
>
>
> Having spent some time in hid/ lately I strongly dislike the idea of more of
> that sort of thing.  It adds zero new functionality, just allows people to
> doggedly cling to their favorite platform.  The implementations behind the
> hid diverge and make every actual feature you might wand to fix or add
> harder.  Gtk works.  Gtk2 works.  "It might break or go away 5 years from
> now" is not much of an argument for doing the big work required to support
> other things.

I think we need it in the long run. Eventually we should be adding
macos support.



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/