X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HUKYLgmdBE7Gxo0FuHkhnxIvB6Vb9OFBJFmLLRrLRrI=; b=rGPFV4ABn9+7DGvxgAiOGb8etKkw29R1aPJEMKjosgCVMTTzRnTynYJKP4Ssf6AraW +f5LwPHPm9jcfL8ogIJME3fIBUr0ToQ31dkrX796Re6DzZ0cG3llfC7bCTQoheTDVGe+ OneSEnd4nSrNA5Nc+MhVfgd7ZxCzAM+sDzdte5TeXB3om/c1iGZ8hwncxacMEyh2l1NS gM5GvxNj6xqpQGA9I39VQkAU/H2DhI4N1kYY2zgkm/9X37ErRe+rObAhuKr3CEZWa/xQ nKTVV6rx43qHoUw5ct+M0ucsRcQyVYmhgvqVB5fAj33+CD5bBV1r58PZfO3QSzrDuM6/ 4oJg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.134.73 with SMTP id pi9mr10050307lbb.83.1443998224276; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 15:37:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201510020536 DOT t925a5PK017417 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <560EA183 DOT 8000508 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510021906 DOT t92J6v9r019933 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510040016 DOT t940GpCE003940 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3C084FA0-E756-4D90-A4AD-C1C1D8431000 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 22:37:04 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Evan Foss wrote: > >> The issue is users have trouble with the fact that the console is >> console/Makefile driven. I proposed earlier to have a program that >> lets you define workflows in gschem and then produce a Makefile just >> like we design schematics in gschem and then make netlists via >> gschem. Does anyone else have an idea? >> >> Bigger question for the whole of gEDA. Igor2 posted a really nice >> demo of gschem handling back annotation (really notation) and none >> of you said squat on the list. > > Well, Igor made it abundantly clear that he does not intend to merge > his fork back to the main tree. This makes his developments kind of > moot to me. If the feature is a wanted one someone would feel motivated to investigate it at least as a proof of concept. That way other people who might want to put the labor into merging it would have some kind of barometer. > ---<)kaimartin(>--- > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/