X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yAGFsB92NvjObDfqv6sj+H0eejrjXwPYbKvGKCeLtjU=; b=kcVvvRFZox227+UKMsjaatCKONtNDC03c8hJluvYZjWYEaoGWU3Okr7u/fxJD/PfXJ aVXq+V+tHHVQcENMKLF6cRoZH20+RjouFeB6dagErb9m3SLGfeV/SrwsYYwdO4vgSQXx sCu1OdS/R807rrRV8u6ddHyQy4wgXGSK2YE/fhZVspxv5elZPmGGYwxFRV1CJj6QrWyx XNUBqBgyRCMacGzVwZlPvOEnHuQ+mo0p4i19DK5S6q5q9bgrjKCrD/bynNQRFelQPyUf qJzm555l6l3alIhKhLiMUwbxbNgKhoagbKKekDZNXDP1ZgFzESMKwoSMJht0aUWD3Ht5 OHbw== X-Received: by 10.180.187.141 with SMTP id fs13mr8159615wic.13.1443979638049; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 10:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 19:27:16 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer Message-Id: <20151004192716.aed111eda679b33c18c8329f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151003222248 DOT GB4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <1443972926 DOT 671 DOT 14 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > >>> And that's the "success story" of our community. > >>> Every smart enough hacker tries to rewrite everything in his > >> favourite > >>> language. > >>> > >> > >> You say that like if you didn't insist on using scheme. I mean you > >> don't > >> have to rewrite gschem because it already uses your favorite > >> language, but > >> would you join Stefan and write ruby instead? > > > > Sorry, I do not really understand that comment. > > My point is that it is totally okay that people prefer their own lagnuages > and sometimes rewrite stuff when they think they have a better idea (or > better preferences). I doubt that Vladimir would do otherwise in a > similar situation - it's just lucky for him that his language preferneces > happen to meet gschem's. > > Regards, > > Igor2 I think ADA is probably the best available language but I usually write in C. Usually language is not very important although readily available suitable software libraries may however be rather important. Nicklas Karlsson