X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 18:38:08 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer In-Reply-To: <1443972926.671.14.camel@ssalewski.de> Message-ID: References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151003222248 DOT GB4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <1443972926 DOT 671 DOT 14 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 04:58 +0200, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >>> And that's the "success story" of our community. >>> Every smart enough hacker tries to rewrite everything in his >> favourite >>> language. >>> >> >> You say that like if you didn't insist on using scheme. I mean you >> don't >> have to rewrite gschem because it already uses your favorite >> language, but >> would you join Stefan and write ruby instead? > > Sorry, I do not really understand that comment. My point is that it is totally okay that people prefer their own lagnuages and sometimes rewrite stuff when they think they have a better idea (or better preferences). I doubt that Vladimir would do otherwise in a similar situation - it's just lucky for him that his language preferneces happen to meet gschem's. Regards, Igor2