X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S+GGRL3oM2usxXdM5zGvcCOmi94SV5yfa9vkgcwaMwA=; b=CSN6IwXK3iYuSDDlXxDydH4XEafR1AyTVo6meY0g4CaBs8WMa6ncAd6jARo7Dyv6VD qB+mNoFC6hKpgP+1bY4o3ky2gNAXAsG+xd8NpLbnwq8fJMN16vuV48U8dhhHh/aPKguq RMF7RJ8lsJQ7eBmdQ5BADKJJem07QMK6XnZuPBdF4MzuUkKb2CgSudL6w0XbqfyXitZ1 FqeZ8Vpar1fiRKuEtQ3oXoD2UBc4WGoS3qUCcI/J9BydwG+vpRudzldu3aFv/LgzG5iB 6N+LTC9B5XzmBEsVe498b7LrEpN6pz6UrbpyQ22s9G79ZV3FBYztmNzdxwFzOUED5rFK PXWA== X-Received: by 10.194.248.198 with SMTP id yo6mr7214967wjc.66.1443944814232; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 00:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 09:46:49 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] making DRC less misleading in the presence of shorts, non-routed rats, etc. Message-Id: <20151004094649.6dc054ec476455fa98afa1c9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <560F9AC7 DOT 3040607 AT jump-ing DOT de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > Am 03.10.2015 um 01:21 schrieb Britton Kerin: > > > > > At the moment DRC catches near-shorts (trace too close to another), but > > is > > > completely silent when there's an actual short. > > > > That's expected, that's what DRC does. Checking for shorts means to > > > > When I started, it was not at all expected. Its weird that you can go from > almost-short, to short, and thereby make a violation vanish. In fact it's > pretty easy to accidentally create a short while fixing a proximity > violation. I happened to catch it before ordering the prototype boards but > only I think you are right. Nicklas Karlsson