X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] making DRC less misleading in the presence of shorts, non-routed rats, etc.
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 04:17:38 +0200
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <muq282$f51$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAC4O8c_kjtsHhyjH+fPZvhDdPxc+Z+L5RxPy4SpJ8dmcGNKMiA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <munf8m$u7l$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <560F9BE2 DOT 80104 AT jump-ing DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-107-162.net-htp.de
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Markus Hitter wrote:

> Am 03.10.2015 um 04:41 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
>> You mean a use case where the user manually deletes long range rats
>> to get a better feel for the local situation? IMHO, a delete is
>> already a crutch in itself.
> 
> Generated rat lines are only a hint. If one deletes them, they'll
> re-appear on the next "optmize rats", so they're not really
> "deleted".

That's why I went on to wishful think about an ignore flag for rats :)

---<)kaimartin(>---