X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iFWsgMMi/xlEgOGnB3E1J5OhyPHAUAELu3ksFr8L7P8=; b=iwWPZ4TzxsGwdUIC+3fP6kLzOMGAKwu9zHvP5T86bL0lT9GLuFBrMZ4ZC1lIc0Lrb+ 5Capli+DfwWEPBfhp4bSiD7AmGvLoNDR4TPgTDvJaL5ZTR7Po6jDqWWLVs8T3xRjBe30 aARSixVjL+S4PUjAMXSylnDqfHS10GvGlkI+G2zKGi9Sn9HpDyyPtIksPN7SdlSj/8Dh aszrn1nyWRECqMji6QnRmlczc4T2H+90ToIvN4mNJB7S2n0t7rP7q+nnmdXfQZziDHmD QapojSD2wVJ/P5hJV3sJQ4qJyIiG5KbLzNUjGk3sJ5gTpkU9UKgiir+zAtH8xd5CPGrN oiKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.8.227 with SMTP id u3mr22985481wja.38.1443920604318; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:03:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201510040036.t940ae4M004656@envy.delorie.com> References: <56100AF8 DOT 4090802 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510040036 DOT t940ae4M004656 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 17:03:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Clutterless user interface or even more custom special super features? From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d9c07b4512905213cf656 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7b5d9c07b4512905213cf656 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 4:36 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > ... I learned that there are no less than three special modes for > > ignoring text, hiding text and/or ignoring anything but text exist. The > > bug is a crashing one, hitting Undo takes the whole application with it, > > data lost. > > If Undo crashed, Undo is broken and needs to be fixed. > > The "ignore text" flag was added because a lot of users were trying to > move elements and ended up moving their labels instead. The "only > text" option is for the case where they're organizing the labels at > the end of layout and don't want to accidentally move anything else. > Oh that does sound conveninet, I'll have to try it. > > It was a commonly asked for feature, and well received at the time. > > > 1. Add a lot more special case search code to check not only for mode > > flags like ONLYNAMESFLAG, but also under which conditions this search > > happens. This easily makes one special case for every other case. 3 > > names modes x 12 drawing modes = 36 cases. > > Our search has much more complexity than that. Handling locked > vs unlocked and tool-specific things makes it all very complex. > > > 2. Disable modes like track drawing mode while in names only > > mode. This would be the advertised behaviour. Also a lot of code and > > on top of this, unexpected user behaviour ("I can't draw tracks > > anymore and I don't know why"). > > I like this idea; perhaps a tool tip over the disabled tool buttons > that says 'disabled due to the "only text" option' or something. > I'd probably not notice it due to mental tooltip filters. Perhaps a popup when user tries to go into line (etc.) mode or enables these modes while in line etc. mode --047d7b5d9c07b4512905213cf656 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 4:36 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>= wrote:

> ... I learned that there are no less than three special modes for
> ignoring text, hiding text and/or ignoring anything but text exist. Th= e
> bug is a crashing one, hitting Undo takes the whole application with i= t,
> data lost.

If Undo crashed, Undo is broken and needs to be fixed.

The "ignore text" flag was added because a lot of users were tryi= ng to
move elements and ended up moving their labels instead.=C2=A0 The "onl= y
text" option is for the case where they're organizing the labels a= t
the end of layout and don't want to accidentally move anything else.

Oh that does sound conveninet,= I'll have to try it.
=C2=A0

It was a commonly asked for feature, and well received at the time.

> 1. Add a lot more special case search code to check not only for mode<= br> > flags like ONLYNAMESFLAG, but also under which conditions this search<= br> > happens. This easily makes one special case for every other case. 3 > names modes x 12 drawing modes =3D 36 cases.

Our search has much more complexity than that.=C2=A0 Handling locked
vs unlocked and tool-specific things makes it all very complex.

> 2. Disable modes like track drawing mode while in names only
> mode. This would be the advertised behaviour. Also a lot of code and > on top of this, unexpected user behaviour ("I can't draw trac= ks
> anymore and I don't know why").

I like this idea; perhaps a tool tip over the disabled tool buttons
that says 'disabled due to the "only text" option' or som= ething.

I'd probably not= notice it due to mental tooltip filters.=C2=A0 Perhaps a popup when
<= div style=3D"">user tries to go into line (etc.) mode or enables these mode= s while in
line etc. mode=C2=A0
<= br>
--047d7b5d9c07b4512905213cf656--