X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:35:22 -0400 Message-Id: <201509171635.t8HGZMAP018692@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (message from John Doty on Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:17:04 -0600) Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon References: <201509132148 DOT t8DLmxI6003481 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509132300 DOT t8DN0sE6006134 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7EF3E562-BC7F-4853-B90A-29726FDFEBF6 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509132319 DOT t8DNJBjC006829 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <40057B48-2FD4-4A37-A01E-9344F6C33ADF AT noqsi DOT com> <201509140138 DOT t8E1cqY1011780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9YS.JVf3.4bTQ}uiaVeU DOT 1LzcJP AT seznam DOT cz> <20150916121330 DOT GA2687 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509170130 DOT t8H1UnMI003657 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > There is still a progression each developer must follow - starting > > with the smallest of contributions and working their way up to various > > levels of trust. This is not unique to us, although the distrust of > > the process seems to be. > > Part of the problem is that gEDA is really two projects with > orthogonal technological approaches. How does that affect the way contributers earn trust, or how people feel about that process?