X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh= D8VMUmDCvWR3keo8DTUjPTzeysg4la+Yoq0JGTPzzic=; b=WIhP+A9HWTVPnyPy pS0lMeQyVjt7Mqs1D9EwOLkgBL7Mo4Y9zopq/igzKztLKp+L07+jwgY1miOVmw+e t1HtADg66YXw+Nkcz+jMXTH2WmnB7RlbLbduuFwc5s1PWZFlgwW25cA7LE37nxKh w1SR+zws95HLAKM+OcyqbGTOKRQ= Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <201509132148 DOT t8DLmxI6003481 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509132300 DOT t8DN0sE6006134 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7EF3E562-BC7F-4853-B90A-29726FDFEBF6 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509132319 DOT t8DNJBjC006829 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <40057B48-2FD4-4A37-A01E-9344F6C33ADF AT noqsi DOT com> <201509140138 DOT t8E1cqY1011780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9YS.JVf3.4bTQ}uiaVeU DOT 1LzcJP AT seznam DOT cz> <20150916121330 DOT GA2687 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509170130 DOT t8H1UnMI003657 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> From: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <55FA93C5.8010005@jump-ing.de> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:19:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201509170130.t8H1UnMI003657@envy.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Am 17.09.2015 um 03:30 schrieb DJ Delorie: >> Unless I missed something, it started with DJ being bold and single >> handedly lower several barriers. > > A boldness born out of desperation I fear. Seeing the outcome I'm glad you felt desperate :-) One thing I've learned in other communities is that nobody, not even the dumbest newbie, tries to harm intentionally. We all try to improve things, discussions are mostly about which direction this is, nobody tries to intentionally go backwards. Newbies are more likely to make mistakes. So what? Instead of locking them out it's much better to put measures into place which make such mistakes harmless or easily reversible. This eases acting of experienced people, too, a win for both. Speaking of source code, using a distributed VCS is such a measure, because every developer has a clone on his local disk. When it comes to web pages, one can ask them to develop new pages in a seperate place, first. Not much extra work, actually it just meets best practices of experienced people. > There is still a progression each developer must follow - starting > with the smallest of contributions and working their way up to various > levels of trust. This is not unique to us, although the distrust of > the process seems to be. My rule of thumb is: never delete or decline work of others. If newbies want to rewrite pcb from scratch: let them, make it possible. Either they're geniusses which actually manage to do so, or they learn them selfs they can't stem it. A rewrite doesn't harm the existing version at all. Still such a rewrite attempt has good chances to bring in some parts which can be applied to the existing application for the win of both. I'm happy about the direction geda-project.org currently moves. Markus -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/