X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=CkpN+F//Q2X7DIbw8r0th9N1KwrdyKyQt3J3rWkMcS8=; b=wG/UuocJsBrirUQmqFwajiROToBrcu6pPX7vDMDnqZECQ8QcnBFRXijoJl1+VFQZlP rHCAbs8a3tAqSaGbT+GOG/Q0gMxAe4EcUzv+7HOtIM9Pht99eJ0u2G6zhtlYMY4cAWFQ IIsvUGUe/foT+eqjC1nZl+Rius10p2F4wjnKiSbIROYuquqcUEjq3Qf38Y9wr3MgjwHx reySZCKUGVz5F/uGo5Zhwjw582BcZ6JNC1vFlkidkME8FKKgFCsoHuOZ2XBNdr7ZNOrT gOY/QJA5GYAMqpveGGZgwEkkva0XO3RXXH+kcQfUP9T++MwQ1WUgcKQrLHJsQNYZId44 rYMA== X-Received: by 10.112.130.136 with SMTP id oe8mr48443lbb.20.1442466387141; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:06:24 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon Message-ID: <20150917050623.GC1837@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <201509132300 DOT t8DN0sE6006134 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7EF3E562-BC7F-4853-B90A-29726FDFEBF6 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509132319 DOT t8DNJBjC006829 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <40057B48-2FD4-4A37-A01E-9344F6C33ADF AT noqsi DOT com> <201509140138 DOT t8E1cqY1011780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9YS.JVf3.4bTQ}uiaVeU DOT 1LzcJP AT seznam DOT cz> <20150916121330 DOT GA2687 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:36:19AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > >> 2. Not everyone who should be is on the developers list is because > >> some folks wanted to play gate keeper. This killed off trolling and > > Please tell me privately whom you want to see on the developer list. > > Decision making in private, i.e with no communication to the general > public, was the way to run all things geda since at least 2009. It seems > plausible, that this contributed to drive the project into the sad state > which it currently is. Make people feel not involved and they tend to walk > away where they feel more welcome. > Note, I am not lobbying to hold general votes. The keyword above is > communication. It was not about hiding names of heroes. It was just about not flooding the list. If you want to discuss names, let's do it in another thread. > > > > I could not say about other developers, but my feel is I'd now more > > appreciate one patch rather than hundreds of "great ideas of how to > > develop further" in the list. > > There is a tradition to let patches bit rot on launchpad. New ideas get > relegated to "plugins" "feature-branches" > Back in 2009 when I was motivated to get involved in geda coding, I had to > ask several times with weeks or months in between on the list to read "no > time" and finally "don't like". Please see, we are keep working on the project trying to apply patches and fix bugs. I don't really understand what you're complaining about? ... > Moving topics to a closed list puts those off, who are outside the gates. > This may be acceptable in a situation where crowd are eager to join. > However, with geda the opposite is true. The project desperately needs > contributors. Sure. If you or John Doty would ever try to join the gEDA developer team, I gladly approved both of you. However, sometimes it seems to me both of you are trying to distance yourself from other developers. Cheers, Vladimir