X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Apollon From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <201509131824.t8DIOCBc028428@envy.delorie.com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:04:31 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <798E233F-19D4-435C-B6E2-DC6BD352CB4E@noqsi.com> References: <20150913140631 DOT 1da1b78d AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201509131529 DOT t8DFTUVS022118 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509131824 DOT t8DIOCBc028428 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sep 13, 2015, at 12:24 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> If you do this right, you wind up with *exact* knowledge of every >> point in the x/y Cartesian geometry. Sines and cosines of these >> angles are rational numbers. No roundoff error. You can choose any >> unit basis you want (I'd go with meters). > > I thought of this for arcs - define the endpoints and the radius, not > the center and angles (there are other issues in this example, but > still). You're limited to what snaps to your grid, but if your grid > is nanometers that's a very small error. > > You do tend to go off-angle pretty quickly though, since so many > angles result in irrational numbers. > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com