X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OfVM/3BapalkYfktpR4eorcSaxm/ClGkmiyLSz+Z+T0=; b=qK0KbJVSg1FtgIqEM5YMlm2wSzybcmV3EpaW7qVD5/sByXKSasdgRo5Eazp/zZjU6i s25PXdHk1gQiHgnccWzc4PiEO0QCmQ4vkXKHPtMgY5f84VRXmxlba5PvjHOuBwSGcHsz G5UvlHwKnBm4KwalWMX8m5WzMCfY1uO4fIUh+QE4cQdEo04MwcmlJKq/uM09cyEpIpxl +3yg4ZwMefhLgYeFhaC1rZqadJjEvWprDyT1KcyQjdYPs1mwo/T3xeiP9+gS3InpufsJ mAFt22wBo4AnK2QJ+MSsfyeOcj5thUj1noTp/27YFlxrllcoQrx2UevteRLDq+QONZWf Q5HQ== X-Received: by 10.180.187.244 with SMTP id fv20mr16436134wic.23.1442150337791; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 06:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:18:52 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Apollon Message-Id: <20150913151852.7ca8ed54d2c8036e3e83222d@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150913140631.1da1b78d@jive.levalinux.org> References: <20150913140631 DOT 1da1b78d AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > I finished the documentation of my proposed data structure. I pushed it > into the home/lev/apollon branch. There are slight changes from the > former version. > > Please give me feedback. This is my first push into the repository, so I'm > also open to comments about usual commit messages, etc. > > I also attach a pdf of my document. > > The next step is to make a decision on data structure, and how to implement > that in gEDA/pcb. Holes usually span all layers but a buried via only span some layers. There is also the case with plugged vias, with hole in the board but not the copper or? The concept of a padstack seems good. Currently there are symbold in gschem and footprints in pcb, 4.5.2.3 "component" is this the same as footprint? Sometimes a local change on only one of several footprints of the same type is needed and if footprint is stored only once this must be work around in some way.