X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qFUpSTSYvConEMdBgqez8hMhqTUlAXoPzHlgH68ErRM=; b=DT+JJ0X1SYN8vPRwgt7ApGoFu6dTC18BQPpMFy+1A5y3weKfnmSR3TNlG3jS2yAo66 Lzce/AZAJ/XetgcVI5/bFWOqyUAluWSIon/Fui0dV57F3StlHBaff0CLnCQlczDrr8vU nvv/tSmFJRGsmHAHKfZIBDY1gTbGRyXgupk4N91rlcjHRvyEmSI3/THTxRWGm7YOBa/m mnwflP7CJhlpHrlsT2VMo11YHmBtUc/M7tkHEd9iKkqN29AXIII19y6yZjwXm5Q/IzA5 Uaciy6kVfUD9sGRkInAP8UxnQoaHza5H4jIgkRTT/hLOU13X2/tJ2au9ThnGNj7l5DOZ EvjQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.37.12 with SMTP id l12mr60285820iol.92.1441893765474; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:02:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55F1890F.4090705@ecosensory.com> References: <55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E8831A DOT 8050307 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de> <69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> <55F1890F DOT 4090705 AT ecosensory DOT com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:02:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Desired changes From: "Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:43 AM, John Griessen wrote: > On 09/10/2015 06:53 AM, Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> * there is no way to do blind and buried vias >> >> Actually that is not true. Buried in the archives is someone that >> rebased PCB to include a long forgotten patch on SourceForge to do >> those. > > > I'm going to have a 433MHz chip radio design coming up soon... > Will you tell us more about that Bob? On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Armin Faltl <[1]armin DOT faltl AT aon DOT at> wrote: Hi, while I can clearly live without that feature, I read that blind and burried vias are not possible with PCB. Look at the message from Ineiev on 9/28/2009 in the archives: [2]http://www.mail-archive.com/geda-user AT moria DOT seul DOT org/msg20249.html "I [Ineiev] just rebased the patch against current GIT master head here: [3]http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/dti.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stefan_ ba-blind.and.buried Not sure if it would have been better to communicate with the original author, though; and probably it would be useful to review the testpcb that Bert Timmerman mentioned in order to make it more reliable." References 1. mailto:armin DOT faltl AT aon DOT at 2. http://www.mail-archive.com/geda-user AT moria DOT seul DOT org/msg20249.html 3. http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/dti.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stefan_ba-blind.and.buried