X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/CKWZyK0d1ZM37Ltmum9nbEXrUx1SD+10gSt+cW1/hs=; b=hi/jJ6luKPq+aCcgpbNDneP6UR8HNXnTeik3RbHn7zGROkSaazGiS17DQT+rkCSgp3 Xgc+6bQ51m9/T6qnFqgScIFi3oJua3XXGYsXKqs5fTOUigxzUN3wk1qs0NZybGnXFwAQ s9kvQ4l44XAeRIw5cy0Ac2csyuORjmsIf/fF7Dbz51Y0ma7RV64MqX1djNr0TYSNCruW /5gMrQqF4jOrPLHSGZFokEg18xc5DpCNY29xt6jV4VKt0b+P4ID0Wu0UvabnLWr5xujB FB/3e3T4p6Kz2gLxitfTGTyD7GNzZS15FxjCbk4EVb/96c2LaKpHyZPU3cVjiB6KyvmU c2GQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.142.37 with SMTP id rt5mr5460385igb.88.1441886029457; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:53:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E8831A DOT 8050307 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de> <69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:53:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Desired changes (was:"New experimental netlist features") From: "Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk >>> * there is no way to do blind and buried vias Actually that is not true. Buried in the archives is someone that rebased PCB to include a long forgotten patch on SourceForge to do those. What was never completed was any documentation on how to use it. Was about ~four years ago.