X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:00:49 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] back annotation proposal (RFC) In-Reply-To: <20150831134127.9dccc4c2563ce7bba5ded79d@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <201508301802 DOT t7UI2twS031311 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201508310341 DOT t7V3fcfh022966 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150831111604 DOT 5b1bb421bc015de9a848e8a9 AT gmail DOT com> <55E42456 DOT 5080309 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150831112032 DOT GA8963 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <20150831134127 DOT 9dccc4c2563ce7bba5ded79d AT gmail DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Guys, I'm not sure you've read my proposal and the purpose of the thread. Just pondering because these ideas got very far from my original plans already. Are any of you vounteering to do the scheme part, or are we just conducting the old style back annotation thread? Regards, Igor2