X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:43:37 -0400
Message-Id: <201508310443.t7V4hb9e025737@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1508310637471.6924@igor2priv>
	(gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] back annotation proposal (RFC)
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508301838470 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <201508301802 DOT t7UI2twS031311 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAM2RGhRgPQG2WDFVb0SFvMbypyYKS2oYtD=851WHR6fOB4iWdA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201508310341 DOT t7V3fcfh022966 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508310637471 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> I generally like most of this. I have some constraints, tho: your
> idea needs massive gnetlist backend coding, which means a lot of
> scheme coding.  I am not up to that and I have no contributor
> willing to do that. (Your idea also requires much more support in
> pcb-rnd, but I'm fine with that part.) Unless my contributor-problem
> gets solved, I will probably need to go for a simpler solution even
> if that is less generic.

Right, it needs a big "something" added to gnetlist (or a big
something that *calls* gnetlist) to do this.