X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=k7xEgvqasPfOAcHnp+DEdGTPbvBLiR8JytPaVVNpR38=;
        b=jLU3q1n/V4lyer/lqN7JGAvB6E5wAhPrBXOkZL6bUKUxuJlGOcjZ7ZhY36dNcNgUfe
         nTCdzyu7D0rV6Ayv3G+gUoF/oT3nazI25L+8KepYlrd2s1FtFpkPQFRk8I/VXzjFZ+I3
         5hDVahB0Xe53cvxtiSsBlzoOMSUzg66LJaJ6W1Bxohby6ekM9tQ7vdx7pheaHj8HYjPH
         9okU36eseIx5H6eDUmQmsFtENipapKjutyj2pFyXG5gSaeWaqnfXKZvmk/fxfc7McK77
         yVJ40PZgJmqI1xV5dAQJ5R8P8McHys13LBwAb6yZu/BXD0J2eZU/ZD0kt+GRSIMtCCpF
         QKYA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.153.7.67 with SMTP id da3mr90026lad.84.1440617496510; Wed,
 26 Aug 2015 12:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <98C29CD9-40F4-4053-92C1-534531CD745F@noqsi.com>
References: <20150824223846 DOT 0ba61ba7 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55DBA2B7 DOT 1080501 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAHUm0tNAY8TY485-imFoTHJqRha=99bmO_3a9f_jjpWCU4x8Zg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CACwWb3COWw41-L8dNw9qhfkYT2wF7=7oC1cEhRbKLV4pHdTMaA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55DC31E0 DOT 9050606 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CACwWb3CYGx9hyTB5T-v=oCZd=Vs2VAGQ65h9vWhugt2COuVHUQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQd1KHHmgd2qX5+rNzTDdzqFjbmurF8MFN2RwaE3E7ZTQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150825215611 DOT 1794b153c4160dddb739b6d3 AT gmail DOT com>
	<55DDCF2E DOT 6070505 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<6CBA9A3C-526A-4364-9E70-83A910349E14 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508261843130 DOT 6849 AT lichen>
	<98C29CD9-40F4-4053-92C1-534531CD745F AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:31:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhRsUOWb+j24Np2myPDkA9o6L5+KVOrTH=zUJH4XF85zow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] netlisting libraries
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7QJVeWM032309
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:21 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, John Doty wrote:
>>> The overloading of pinseq is really the only one I’ve found troublesome, so gnet-spice-noqsi gives you other ways to handle slotted devices.
>>
>> I've never understood the motivation for the SPICE netlist backends to use pinseq= at all.  Is this just a hack to get the unslotted pinnumber?  Or is there some other mechanism involved?
>
> I believe it’s copied from the Viewlogic architecture. It never worked right there, either.

I thought you use pinseq refer to spice models and pinnumber refers to
pins on a part as packaged. The part that is screwy is how we pretend
that symbols are light (package & footprint agnostic) when changing
their footprint changes their pin numbers.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/