X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CBOPXMQQd3orlYZcGD3Wjh1GB0y392eu37J9Jp+CeaY=; b=jhA9L7VozHuCRbPYt/PMpv4NXawVVAH/tmtnCHGHAPoMkbhXmJv4rekh1O58bGPW/X OcJpTImsFnJzSUheDZW8llB8Yb+ujwGoGSK2nH7D5CX+50VTrIDu2zRDSxtKGOYGoQ2g WawC+VVMO10BiOgfaMdcGLaBrW5gq4G7/1Zbb9FQMa8tIAmz0GbJICxH3GfuSsUdzTqs 9rMfVowg6wX6+Nen0vzI2/jD1QRL3VXKZ1R/JItucahqeWj35p72h7wa6le0hOdclVzP CRAn9Xd7Uvj3ErmPDYDjuz8WVW2CdbCqOOtWV4v/amuTjnmxrosb9Jf9VK8TUB9m2LVh HBhg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.160.73 with SMTP id xi9mr73680lbb.92.1440617150791; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201508261803.t7QI3QWS003018@envy.delorie.com> References: <20150824223846 DOT 0ba61ba7 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <55DBA2B7 DOT 1080501 AT ecosensory DOT com> <55DC31E0 DOT 9050606 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150825203732 DOT 12446 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20150826120216 DOT f1393e48edb18e1379c733ce AT gmail DOT com> <201508261803 DOT t7QI3QWS003018 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:25:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb file format From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:03 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Exactly. PCB currently does this only it does not have all the >> information in a unified structure. > > It's in 'extern PCBType *PCB;' so while the structure may be a little > obtuse, it's certainly unified. Sorry mis spoke/typed. Look you all know what my view is on this and most of you share it. >> It does iterate through the list of connected items and build a >> netlist but things like design rules are apparently processed in a >> messier way. > > Because the concept of "connected" in pcb becomes a geometry problem, > not a logic problem. DRC is messy because it's a messy problem to > solve, with many solutions, and the one originally chosen wasn't > neccessarily the one we might have chosen today. > > (btw: drc is handled by running the netlist code multiple times, so > that "but" doesn't work that way either - it's the *same* code ;) Ok -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/