X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:49:33 +0200
From: "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [geda-user] Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization (was: Re:
 [geda-user] Buttons for automation (obligatory grab at our shared 3rd rail)
 Re: [geda-user] Antifork)
Message-ID: <20150825144933.GA9557@visitor2.iram.es>
References: <CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl>
 <6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com>
 <201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508250534570 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
 <3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C@noqsi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details:   (-1.0 points)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -0.0 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%
                             [score: 0.3292]
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: repo.hu]
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:51:17AM -0400, John Doty wrote:
> 
> On Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> 
> >  The drive is low too: even with the clumsy modelling John likes to keep bashing pcb for, it works surprisingly well in practice. 
> 
> I think part of our problem is that if pcb makes sense to you, gschem does not, and vice-versa.

At least in my case, I'd say you are well over 100% wrong.

    Gabriel