X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 18.111.63.151 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <55DC6491.8030607@iae.nl> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:18:21 -0400 Message-Id: <3FA132D6-A8D9-47C8-8D37-E1962EF4098B@noqsi.com> References: <6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com> <201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com> <8DC5050C-49D2-49AD-94B0-A1FC857178E5 AT noqsi DOT com> <55DC6491 DOT 8030607 AT iae DOT nl> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7PDISEk019671 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Aug 25, 2015, at 8:50 AM, myken wrote: > On 25/08/15 14:25, John Doty wrote: >> Perhaps not so much you, but much of the “let’s make gschem better” that I see here is really “let’s make gschem more like pcb”. And, of course, the reason I find pcb such a horror is that it is not like gschem in its design. > Isn't the whole idea in this thread "let's make gschem/pcb more accessible”? Yes, but the answer looks *completely* different depending on whether you’re coming from a pcb (integrated tool) or geda-gaf (toolkit) perspective. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com