X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PA7+p8DOosBTwMnQ15ubntsSNt8qTc9VP2FEf87stIQ=; b=LLXplT3Xqyc3t8kMJA5ifOnJepqQBvseJ+CETzd78T9J+8xTBfLev1PzHCheCPg0UM z33sFygnqIXPvTGZdb9EzXo5xje4yxccnNFZRGO+C+C1YaH1OlsnlEyW8rb7p8c6QKav mxdq7BYUgZ8LbM/UBlkSScrcMvWSzWPKUigb1LWRnIjST8InBsGcUdsn3HPXnBWvqAtK pOe6E8SSgQlUyya3Rcl3S8a/jGyCUmuuUEZYCgb6GXOf/a9LH31XLI8ujDHq+cEBOItk t8DC+t/fJiZfr7aIuPXGJlySnaBBNR7jgLC+SVcB5lWuGQdnxDjR+PmgOFrSyQf0vqft VIpA== X-Received: by 10.152.6.194 with SMTP id d2mr24623597laa.93.1440492406890; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:46:41 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb file format Message-Id: <20150825104641.9f1ba6623db9fda707c7cdc7@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20150824223846 DOT 0ba61ba7 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201508250312 DOT t7P3CIUG027159 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk I think there may be cases then you want a polygon on the silkscreen. Sometimes it is useful to add graphics on some extra layer for example to mark the area for conformal coating. On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:27:05 +0200 "Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > Okay. I want to clarify one thing. I have full respect for gEDA developers. > I have made lots of boards with gEDA. > > But I think we have to move on. > > AFAIK in footprints, one can not have silkscreen ploygons. > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:12 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > > > I think (DJ is the authority here) our current file architecture does > > > not do ovals > > > > We do round-ended rectangles (i.e. for tssop pads), square and round, > > and octagons. > > > > > > With this data format, one can define arbitrary footprints. No > > restrictions > > > > like "no silkscreen polygons". > > > > > > To be fair to DJ and the other authors those are not arbitrary. Folks > > > just kind of coded themselves into a corner. > > > > And we do have silkscreen polygons ;-) > >