X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20150729030520.3437.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 05:05:20 +0200
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA fail metrics
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CAOP4iL3PR9Yu1g+iKbQqkYY-pLYBvFFfRUDKmiYhLZTQH0Tbag AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507290419490 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <201507290247 DOT t6T2lYPF025964 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201507290247.t6T2lYPF025964@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

DJ Delorie wrote:
> I feel that way about cmake - it might be a good system, but since
> I don't know it, I avoid things that use it.

Doesn't that say a lot more about you than about cmake?

I mean, I don't like cmake at all, but it seems wrong to avoid
anything that uses cmake just because cmake is unknown, instead of
learning it and being able to benefit from what (great or little, as
the case may be) it adds.


//Peter