X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb-rnd feature poll: please vote From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:29:59 -0600 Message-Id: References: To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6PFU99S031803 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Jul 25, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > I see only weak reason to use the chooser in pcb in the first place. > Footprints are chosen in the schematic. That’s a way to do it, but it’s inflexible and doesn’t scale well. Better to map generic standard gEDA footprint names to the real footprints downstream. Much more flexible. > I only use chooser dialogue in > pcb as a catalogue to see the what is available. This is of course a > bit of a crutch which is only necessary because gschem lacks proper UI > mechanisms to scan the library of footprints. And that’s a good thing. Gschem should not be tied to a particular downstream flow. It doesn’t have a SPICE model browser, either. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com