X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5AAOecyqi7wXQ/zv6Iy5kmRyp3EwnDR+dNtbK1+qUq8=; b=jIsaextyQETeU4TAUDB0Sd5a5j2z+HFX4++VpQMg12fc6z8MdHRlZ1DxsOXQbjPZLb cmmv5Z2Gvx1RT1ZwPDBL1nt/LZJK0HSy5pWkWAYtCpCK36kGM33RTxYxu3Q9AsskEcWG CWCrYQZ+hzGMBgfXP671Dx8PlIo7O6VVR0t2QzndCLeEwWQEC0wUof/M0Q8T9olII+2a Yl/Pq2OPpjXeYtmw3lyii6zv7hQtnjpjaEABvKsLLCZ5/Vf8bgBOGfMLFRxlJOIA8wCR 7Yoiv9Vg+uhYzT1q2jhSfh8uBobrBlH3b1mxcEiFMT0+DrrEdWYxFo/qS0iAMsWMIN+M muVw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr21447405laj.69.1435696763304; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:39:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5592fc59.8b1f450a.1342.10e6@mx.google.com> References: <5592E9B1 DOT 9030908 AT neurotica DOT com> <5592fc59 DOT 8b1f450a DOT 1342 DOT 10e6 AT mx DOT google DOT com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:39:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Lilith the issue is not a fight over 2D vs 3D drawing. The issue is over how the 2D drawing is handled in code. The source code to PCB is kind of troublesome to add onto. I am grateful to it's authors but I must acknowledge that it needs some added care. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lilith Bryant (dark141 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 2015-07-01 07:10:41 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> I'm sorry, but you're wrong. In my case, I am an electronics >> hobbyist, but I've also been a commercial designer for about 25 years. >> I'm betting I'm not the only professional designer here. >> > > Raises my hand as another professional designer. > > Nothing in orbit (yet!), but I do have hundreds of instances > of my 2000+ rat designs running in factories around the globe. > > I *love* the fact that PCB is at it's core a 2D drawing program. KISS. > > I particularly *love* that lines aren't married to nets. Every other > layout program I've tried (including some $$$) make a royal hash of that. > PCB doesn't tie itself up in knots. > > There's a few annoyances in PCB that I'll getting around to fixing one > day, but all and all, it's my pick over even the high $$$ systems. > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/