X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: I do not consent to surveillance, prick
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1435683221;
	bh=GTHF8hN/HRNtg4C2A6QB3v51QoAoy87h0nSv0VmniY0=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=Jq1m61WA/PEYGHgi5iTiByMfHdyOyGKUfOV47Tj9NsaqNlKQ+0hmTWYzxCVcRPcKh
	 9vJJEh2BO8ahsEH7ELmfDRk9t/Dd8ny8JbfZQkR5B2sFm6n3URE7Kq0Qb39+Fl3z+Z
	 jUM9NIosTU+KNcITsGj3+0ZXzOpyIzF2dewaPuOc=
Message-ID: <5592C995.3010009@neurotica.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:53:41 -0400
From: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>	<20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>	<1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>	<CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>	<1435666431 DOT 676 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>	<CAM2RGhQ75UcoEoz4zeEcyEShj+8C8ACJj4-iB7F1r+jyy+bUvw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<5833A5F3-C17B-409D-A3B3-553F9DCFEAC5 AT noqsi DOT com>	<5592ABB1 DOT 7090404 AT plastitar DOT com> <CAM2RGhTo9oB4ddZvLzwkGbvfJU9XxngzC1k4OZaM6apTeW5Fng AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201506301635 DOT t5UGZUnw019984 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <201506301635.t5UGZUnw019984@envy.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 06/30/2015 12:35 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> DJ, You have added substantially to PCB but the issues we are citing
>> were there far far before your involvement. I know you are not a fan
>> of when people rip on PCB, I just want to be clear we are looking at
>> it and not you.
> 
> Yeah, I understand.  I didn't ask to be in charge of pcb.  I was just
> the only one remaining after everyone else left.
> 
> So when I tell people if they want something they'll need to do it
> themselves, it's because there's nobody left to do it but them and me.
> And that goes for me too - there are a lot of things I'd like to
> change in pcb, but I realize that either I do it, or it doesn't
> happen.

  ...and we do appreciate your work very much!

            -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA