X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:44:26 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? In-Reply-To: <20150630082401.GX19654@fi.muni.cz> Message-ID: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <20150630082401 DOT GX19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Jan Kasprzak wrote: > Roland Lutz wrote: > : On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Jan Kasprzak wrote: > : >Maybe some support for autogenerated footprints (such as DIL with > : >various number of pins). > : > : You may find my footprint generator useful: > : https://github.com/rlutz/arthropods > : > : See the file ?sip-dip? for an example DIP configuration. > > Well, this is what I am talking about - this kind of things > should be integrated to gschem/pcb. For example, instead of choosing > a footprint for an axial capacitor from tens of footprints available, > there can be a single parametrized footprint. The same for DIP/DIL/SIP, > for TQFP/QFN, etc. We used to have builtin infra for that: m4 based footprint generation. It was default when I started to use PCB around 2005. I remember "CONNECTOR 2 5" generated a 2x5 header. Recently it's much less popular, maybe even turned off by default. I think the extra complexity of such external scripts and yet another language looks scary to some users.