X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ahwSCzc3Ha5yoMU8yZN+pFYnNK10eq1D8Zi2uJhFtsE=; b=mQQHjTQD64dWXkBr+T+S1sJQJElEzWb92VEKMgIEaLRZ+y3LWOOc2Rk147od+ebvkS ce7cz5wFetTdXKXjm/Rr5lPkU2fOTuZdWp3+Xcb/mSQ5Yct8cYpGwVnb5J79QXnkAdYj WJ3BRftHs6q+IsAKUzmKt5xOqEZk9OuBgoNhwTjy17s+gFK58KO695dDaVrcyhVmv2zb U+Wy1oJ7vepBNzcVpaQEWKh+yTc/RTqkL1svLN0V2asNAskj8qTr7og0ClsqEGtSk+Vs k1xdJJWSMrq1NpNf9zGl+vkvki1hUMepFMhGA9WlQJ8yAJOv/G4AWfqBVY+fbFpTuN+V MVqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.161.197 with SMTP id xu5mr16813984lbb.69.1435626313088; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:05:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <654B0E26-D522-47A6-B674-FDB68576F107@noqsi.com> References: <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435599996 DOT 2704 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <201506292033 DOT t5TKXq06009463 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <13D3A00C-EA98-458A-BC3F-213653FA806A AT noqsi DOT com> <20150629212401 DOT GD28458 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <175C24CA-D7F9-4DD0-BC8C-09A2784BA6C1 AT noqsi DOT com> <3ED06C0F-7F4D-482E-A1D2-EDAB595939D8 AT noqsi DOT com> <654B0E26-D522-47A6-B674-FDB68576F107 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:05:12 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t5U15HY8005513 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Yes but that is not the format PCB accepts. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:52 AM, John Doty wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2015, at 6:36 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) wrote: > >> I was thinking TSV for the other information (refdes to footprint or >> trace properties) but that is cool. > > The standard “bom" gnetlist back end can make a TSV with symbol attributes like footprint, value, etc. The gnetlist API does not have a way to access net attributes. > >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:28 AM, John Doty wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) wrote: >>> >>>> It would be nice to change the way PCB takes data in. I like the >>>> netlist handling but something more CSV or tab delineated would be >>>> nice for the rest of the stuff. >>>> >>> >>> Nothing whatever to do with PCB, but I do sometimes find a TSV netlist useful. Here’s a gnetlist back end that makes a TSV: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >>> http://www.noqsi.com/ >>> jpd AT noqsi DOT com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Home >> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ >> Work >> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ >> >> > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/