X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XprPaxfKaTPWy5dNyH9JAuvofW+Z3kgVsVd6Um9twuY=; b=WEUjttWCbkwnzDIv6jHugBzXzfttGzSRVHQrO6nCEeZyS5ScVB7CyQkzw+2D+zDDzs CTzbJyvTSQI1Db+dBNjgC8N4jHqeMdkJ3QIuK/NoP6s4NINJ6fITlD3rmoPSobXqpJK6 PJItYxuOAmVAqlkc3s8H4+UfJEg+tqvdomoiWa78hknh3xcVwIFt+P6KgcKZbWB9J1vY z6tc7UGTQfeeqHwIthuzzurmSUaJC4QGit3DXjci5Ir2/gItJ2aRh9Ybr4Qypj62XElW jcvwIVa9g33ehIIIsEq7s+nWNq47Bo2BkrWtHuv7p+8Cw7nEkUG2lnOVB0oo01EHwBeJ 770g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.190.10 with SMTP id gm10mr16247826lbc.2.1435621651817; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:47:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <175C24CA-D7F9-4DD0-BC8C-09A2784BA6C1@noqsi.com> References: <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435599996 DOT 2704 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <201506292033 DOT t5TKXq06009463 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <13D3A00C-EA98-458A-BC3F-213653FA806A AT noqsi DOT com> <20150629212401 DOT GD28458 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <175C24CA-D7F9-4DD0-BC8C-09A2784BA6C1 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:47:31 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t5TNlaQj000872 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty : I agree with you. If I do anything it would just be adding extra attributes to gschem and then making another tool to collect them. Something to work in parallel to the netlisters. In the meantime don't worry I am too busy chasing down BSDL file stuff. On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:47 PM, John Doty wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:54:33PM -0600, John Doty wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 2:33 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> John, I have frequently marked off in the comment field how long/wide >>>>> traces can/should be. It would be nice if there was some meaningful >>>>> way to pass that to PCB. That would involve gschem changes in minor >>>>> ways. I am not asking anyone to implement this. Just defending a >>>>> position. >>>> >>>> File->Import imports all attributes as element attributes. I don't >>>> know of anything that *does* anything with it though, aside from some >>>> BOM scripts. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, but the problem is that it can’t import attributes of net >>> segments, since they aren’t in one of the gnetlist views. Gnetlist >>> can’t even see the segments, only the glommed-together nets. And then, >>> nets aren’t “elements”. >> It obviously can do it, since libgeda API has means for it. Once again, >> see my scheme script above in the thread. >> > > That’s using the gschem API, not the gnetlist API. > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/