X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:52:28 -0400 Message-Id: <201506292052.t5TKqSM6010435@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (message from John Doty on Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:45:03 -0600) Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1435599996 DOT 2704 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > But please don't let the shortcut mentality that has made PCB so > rigid and difficult infect geda-gaf. Where did this come from? Did you not meet your quota of insulting pcb this month? If the pcb netlister wants to pull extra info out of a schematic for its own use, that means the netlister's flexibility (something you are harping on all the time) is being used in a useful target-specific way. This flexibility is something you push as a godsend for every target EXCEPT pcb. Your immediate reaction that any enhancement to pcb will destroy the rest of the universe is not useful.