X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:35:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
In-Reply-To: <55902AB9.9000004@neurotica.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1506281932040.6924@igor2priv>
References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) wrote:

> On 06/28/2015 12:52 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>> Recently I saw some messages on gEDA list, last was something about
>> Python netlister just now. So maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage
>> and development is nearly death is wrong?
>
>  I don't know why you would have that impression.  I use it almost
> every day, I just don't talk about it much on the mailing list unless I
> am looking for help with something.  I suspect it's the same for much of
> the user base.

Me too. I did a lot of hobby projects and a few projects for a company 
with gEDA.

I am happy that there are no new releases of gschem stuffed with new 
features - for me, gschem is complete.

Regards,

Igor2