X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: I do not consent to surveillance, prick
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1435511481;
	bh=qGmEF/QCIOFS4EWK+BekiQp3HsBATW1L10xgEe1Ag90=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=K7rFkkBMuY19dCp2H1y7NpoCnyqWbajvUU8qiv9FI3HFcJVVPvGCx9zFihWIY95WA
	 po1GvZAuxBGRs85AGuJNsJgmyK2SI2wgNx7Zugp96pu/fo1HGSMUx94ox9Rrx8XHz1
	 JptFQRwcEeMhZvuFy5ctldXt2tLuLjFUlWnasm5o=
Message-ID: <55902AB9.9000004@neurotica.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:11:21 -0400
From: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <1435510363.682.26.camel@ssalewski.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 06/28/2015 12:52 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Recently I saw some messages on gEDA list, last was something about
> Python netlister just now. So maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage
> and development is nearly death is wrong?

  I don't know why you would have that impression.  I use it almost
every day, I just don't talk about it much on the mailing list unless I
am looking for help with something.  I suspect it's the same for much of
the user base.

              -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA