X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:37:09 -0800
From: Andrew Poelstra <asp11 AT sfu DOT ca>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB sync request for the upcoming Ubuntu long term
 support release
Message-ID: <20111216183708.GA30970@malakian.lan>
References: <CAHu0Z0WqAUZrADSxwywEzi6+KsA5+=hTfgWd7yJWYyxMYaWpHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHu0Z0WqAUZrADSxwywEzi6+KsA5+=hTfgWd7yJWYyxMYaWpHg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 05:28:18PM +0000, Justyn Butler wrote:
>
> [snip]
> 
> Given the large number of bug fixes etc since the last snapshot (and
> because PCB is a non-essential package) I would expect that a sync
> request for pcb from unstable would be accepted, if I've understood
> the process correctly.
> Does that sound sensible? If so shall I do it, or does someone else
> better know what they're doing?
>

What needs to be done before we can do a fresh bugfix release
of pcb? Is it just that somebody with permissions needs to take
the time, or are there pending showstoppers that need dealing
with?

 

-- 
Andrew Poelstra
Email: asp11 at sfu.ca OR apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web:   http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"I don't understand. Are you saying dualism is always good, or always bad?"