X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Dynamic loading personal components (with subfolder) into the search component tree of gschem In-reply-to: References: <20111130211002 DOT 32B5081F6275 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20111203133340 DOT E09A181D541B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20111203215549 DOT 238A581D5424 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to Luigi Salvatore Palese message dated "Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:42:16 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <20111205214441.3691881D543C@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:44:41 +0100 (CET) From: karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Luigi: ... > In attachment an improved version of the script. ... That version works fine. It seems a little strange, though, to use both ftw and opendir. If we are going to use opendir, we could just as well do the traversal ourself and dump ftw. I see two alternatives: a) I'm satisfied with my version, and stop here b) we dump ftw do the traversal ourself clean up your script and proposes it for inclusion in geda What do you think? Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57