X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] open beagle bone compatible design (for linux networking at 0.3 amps)
In-reply-to: <CAOuGh89wk72qdzqBiXNHOS-3ujroTddN=P67oqunr8ssVvJemQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+82U9J4GvssKrnRNOTTMuDc4zHy+PxeWb8OXeWP6NVHfoA0Nw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1486241a-88b7-4c8d-8354-ded392eadf96 AT email DOT android DOT com> <CAA0yOM6e_raSs_3tBv_+1OTNj+cZdN91cJU3hKkeW90E23z4nA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CA+82U9+CzLMdBvyyJxsYWR==BXWjWGrU+zWNXL+-g9tsh7uLbw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAA0yOM5ej1dMOOtcbYYRdc=7yW6hZj=cmpuypYt9c_X_k5NM7A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CA+82U9+2pQBscOYsWBbLPtEpb1MyTEKe5dr8wzdJYJnFqCjWgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAA0yOM5+uj6cHuxVsz18SPqd=ULC_-EbaUb0ffj14wkdj_dHiQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4EC9CE99 DOT 5040303 AT industromatic DOT com> <4ED27309 DOT 6030100 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20111127231842 DOT 3FD9B81F6262 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <4ED30BB2 DOT 8030301 AT ecosensory DOT com> <CAOuGh89wk72qdzqBiXNHOS-3ujroTddN=P67oqunr8ssVvJemQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Comments: In-reply-to Bob Paddock <graceindustries AT gmail DOT com>
   message dated "Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:27:06 -0500."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-Id: <20111130220947.0CA1881F6277@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:09:46 +0100 (CET)
From: karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Bob Paddock:
> > The uarts are built in and the IOs, and maybe even the DAC.
> > Here's the data sheet:
> > http://www.ti.com/product/am3358#inventory
> 
> If you want to avoid BGA's take a look at the module used in the RDK-S2E:
> 
> http://www.ti.com/tool/RDK-S2E

It does not seem compare in performance to the am part.

And if I want a Cortex-M3, I could just as well pick a LPC175x from NXP
or a STM32F1xx from ST, they are awailable in LQFP.

But thanks for tip anyhow.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57