X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=nnBP+mqOB3gP8Mb9mL2omDiE8cU9H3Kgy+zpB0m2w3M=;
        b=clbv/m9Ar1HfbC3pvjCv6dFBBu/EiXB/hImWYSZUvkAVtEr1p1MxPi7/OJ4tD3eqf2
         UL0fx/E+AsdZy1ZqE/e+uU7xxo7wA9yYGZaMCmx88BukZiiknFMyoniFD4QJMN/VJJsm
         BOo0dyRfFbumBIVBx5esV5LGhhZ/BqOgUcWlQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4ED36081.5080507@ecosensory.com>
References: <CA+82U9J4GvssKrnRNOTTMuDc4zHy+PxeWb8OXeWP6NVHfoA0Nw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1486241a-88b7-4c8d-8354-ded392eadf96 AT email DOT android DOT com>
	<CAA0yOM6e_raSs_3tBv_+1OTNj+cZdN91cJU3hKkeW90E23z4nA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CA+82U9+CzLMdBvyyJxsYWR==BXWjWGrU+zWNXL+-g9tsh7uLbw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA0yOM5ej1dMOOtcbYYRdc=7yW6hZj=cmpuypYt9c_X_k5NM7A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CA+82U9+2pQBscOYsWBbLPtEpb1MyTEKe5dr8wzdJYJnFqCjWgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA0yOM5+uj6cHuxVsz18SPqd=ULC_-EbaUb0ffj14wkdj_dHiQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4EC9CE99 DOT 5040303 AT industromatic DOT com>
	<4ED27309 DOT 6030100 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20111127231842 DOT 3FD9B81F6262 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<4ED30BB2 DOT 8030301 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20111128075947 DOT F0D6681F6266 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<4ED36081 DOT 5080507 AT ecosensory DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:07:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOuGh8_6Bw9mpxyzrqcG7SzLBAmUCs9PbVHD4SOJx6VYenFfng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: I won't do BGA's
From: Bob Paddock <graceindustries AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:20 AM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 01:59 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:

[Don't see Karl's message in my email.]

>> I won't do BGA's

BGA's are still better than LGA's or even QFN's.

The latter are a nightmare to get the flux out from under if your aim
is ultralow current, and want a service life of years.

Some parts, Accelerometers for example, leave you with few package options.