X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <4EA8E608.7020002@innocent.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:03:04 -0400 From: Gus Fantanas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com CC: Gabriel Paubert Subject: Speaking of Microwaves (WAS: Re: [geda-user] Working with a 0.1mm grid) References: <20111021025514 DOT GF20384 AT malakian DOT lan> <1319310645 DOT 13417 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <201110230311 DOT p9N3BRr8005619 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20111023185825 DOT GA24148 AT malakian DOT lan> <20111025120859 DOT GA5110 AT iram DOT es> <201110251224 DOT p9PCOk8L024200 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20111026082721 DOT GA18280 AT iram DOT es> <1319670477 DOT 5698 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <20111026234856 DOT GB7333 AT iram DOT es> In-Reply-To: <20111026234856.GB7333@iram.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 10/26/2011 07:48 PM, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:07:57AM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:27 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote: >> >>>> Personally, I've noticed a big improvement in snapping to the ends of >>>> off grid lines (thanks Peter!), which is something I often need to do. >> (Thanks!) > And thank you very much for fixing the insert tool! Just pulled and > compiled, it works fine. > >>> Indeed a few things are easier to do, so there is definitely progress >>> in this area. But I've also noticed sometimes problems with microscopic >>> examination of the result. >> If you can reproduce it, and have a test-case with current git HEAD, >> please send it along. It may be as simple as a computation which doesn't >> take rounding into account properly. > I shall try when I hit it again. I have also a polygon dicer (at least I believe > it is) problem somewhere which I want to submit when I have more details. > >>> I'm designing right now with PCB some very high resolution circuit on alumina, >>> where design rules can be down to 10µm/0.4mil minimal width and spacing, >>> although I stay at a more reasonable 50µm/2mil for my first thin film circuit. >> What is the application? > Switching of microwave signals. Actually there are two different circuits, > one based on RFMD's RFSW2041D and another one based on Hittite's HMC975. > Both circuits have a square shape whose side is 8.89mm (350 mil). > > Actually the design of the (milled aluminum) enclosure is (at least for me) > much more difficult than the PCB, in which everything is at an unusual > scale, but otherwise very simple (the most complex of the 2 circuits > has less than 10 components). > > Regards, > Gabriel > > Speaking of microwave design, I wonder, if one wants to do stripline design and has to use open-shunt stubs, can the ends of the traces be straight instead of oval? If not, could one workaround be, perhaps, creating patch (one-pin footprint) to terminate an open shunt? The width of such pseudo-component would be the same as the width of the trace it "terminates" and the total length of the two would be the calculated length of the shunt. I am not sure how this trick would work for microstrip, though, as the terminating "pseudo-component" would be positioned between planes. This case is probably very rare. I use the version of PCB that came packaged with Ubuntu 11.10. Regards, Gus Fantanas