X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:27:21 +0200 From: Gabriel Paubert To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Working with a 0.1mm grid Message-ID: <20111026082721.GA18280@iram.es> References: <20111021013756 DOT GE20384 AT malakian DOT lan> <20111021025514 DOT GF20384 AT malakian DOT lan> <1319310645 DOT 13417 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <201110230311 DOT p9N3BRr8005619 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20111023185825 DOT GA24148 AT malakian DOT lan> <20111025120859 DOT GA5110 AT iram DOT es> <201110251224 DOT p9PCOk8L024200 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p9Q8RRWf024611 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:53:19PM +1100, Stephen Ecob wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:24 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > Might be related to the new "snap to line intersections" feature. > > Gabriel, you can see which commits implemented that feature here: > > http://git.gpleda.org/?p=pcb.git&a=search&h=0374e23c9a4c6d6039c2ade3fa97fb9bff9bed21&st=commit&s=snap > > Personally, I've noticed a big improvement in snapping to the ends of > off grid lines (thanks Peter!), which is something I often need to do. Indeed a few things are easier to do, so there is definitely progress in this area. But I've also noticed sometimes problems with microscopic examination of the result. I'm designing right now with PCB some very high resolution circuit on alumina, where design rules can be down to 10µm/0.4mil minimal width and spacing, although I stay at a more reasonable 50µm/2mil for my first thin film circuit. Anyway, I've always been able to fix the small issues I've encountered, so it's not a serious problem. I also had the impression that snapping on arc ends was problematic, but I can't reproduce the problem right now. > > Perhaps the much improved snapping of the line tool came at the > expense of the insert tool ? > > I've never used the insert tool, so I can't comment on any change in > its behaviour. Well, it's very useful when you wnat to modify the shape of a polygon, which is very frequent when putting the finishing touches to microwave circuits. I have bisected the problem to commit b59ab044afe3ac362f8cb4da10ea410280b4323a, probably src/insert.c, but I'm busy with other things and can't try to tackle the issue right now (I might find some time over the week-end). Regards, Gabriel