X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Pr3oXVlIjWPQt6JPlDN7R89L+CNCdbNR2LD+C7v9zYI=;
        b=nOVbe0KUIVr9XkVkH+Fc0w5geBPNQz8jUn18YQJapZ00UN4HA3Ogh85FZcr4kQC+Vs
         yGB8d5lk0ynABsaphlAi+YPJC+60jfaCb22SunEPCuO+Kot7sdTYUPRyZcf1WpeXtEv6
         C7t2vXgPyDrpV4Wn/APS00A7RGbddDSRZyyBwvBv3J7M29x7phlh+qFCJzKqtWbw6oHK
         IfcQuFy3DsVShYH/lf39/p3XGj5aMdizySplVxJCc29CUIxBwCBOrcAFkRMq5AcLqW9P
         ISuOwgkrc0qPvTZLRkylgivqg5vAlW2eCRFLMHc69NmrHpSaGbDh8nydZ7kEWwxZleq7
         lu9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Pr3oXVlIjWPQt6JPlDN7R89L+CNCdbNR2LD+C7v9zYI=;
        b=RO90U8Yw/RqG2MjoMX/rw+u7lOChDvWhWdi6jq6G9cxuLMb8VLunuu0BQb+rVY+zTS
         SNC1/qFsWTH3TkI1lPw91ygKrg2yJwFx2dzEUqYXECMv+HtrOsDEP6wQHLSu1t58dGhN
         V8v7W0GxxNjBZymYW2JgWIZhTrjhEqrPvUG2gmqaYGi+Ka+Q98NGtGwLZJEPJbzn5c0y
         ZfVw7Yjj+myKOPpeUbg+gBJpEJeVcNwuoii8JUiIG1IOS7bbbT3LSTrqto3KD0g6hi5b
         09tUgdCVMjNLV3c11rp6dpwiC2kdCTaww2d1UyGR2/xr247t+tLgvPTOLdXr/vhgcYaW
         8xXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIvwxKGWGgiM3rCuezoLlS8TGR+tF55LMTMVHBYY3OcWJDZ68sl
	AIQ1AS2KW8eYOIcah/ULjscmYCZK8nptP7Reum8CNCZt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fGVUP8/wF6lgmnJrRE+myY7KteIaLGM+l9bfdFcnp3bOPYX+GyS++XpcGWFeE83KtKin1QBuKy7SuyR1GxbOg=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5058:: with SMTP id e85mr15411559oib.111.1543269977173;
 Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:06:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7c1717bb-1b7d-360f-d06a-71ee6983eea1@linetec.nl>
References: <eda2cdce-ccc4-67f4-ccde-6798043e5f41 AT linetec DOT nl>
 <B4FB33EE-C263-4E55-AFAB-63059CAC342B AT noqsi DOT com> <7c1717bb-1b7d-360f-d06a-71ee6983eea1 AT linetec DOT nl>
From: "Luis de Arquer (ldearquer AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:06:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGqyy=bCkYxADbRhjfAeCkt2bOccMGUDFHMRy5myyXWjZ3s8_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] [off-topic] 24V automotive (truck) design issues
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id wAQM6IWf023251
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi Richard,

There are quite a few spikes that can damage electronics on the
truck. You can find most of them on ISO 7637 (second part has the
pulses definition). The worst I can remember for car is -150V for 2ms
approx, surely more on trucks. Positive pulses of over 100V happen
often when parallel inductive loads are disconnected (such as windows,
etc), but this are normally under 100us.

Load dump is fairly unusual though, since that requires the battery to
be removed from the truck while alternator is running. Its strength
depends on whether the truck has load dump supressor or not (cars now
normally have it, but I don't know trucks...). With load suppresor,
you may see about 58V for up to 300-400ms. It is currently defined in
ISO 16750-2 (2012 or later).

This may help:
- Try to get the boards that failed for analysis. Did the TVS fail?
- Revise all input capacitors voltage ratings
- It can help having a high voltage series diode at the input such as
BAV21W, followed by a tanky 220uF or higher capacitor: This should get
rid of most pulses, except load dump.
- For load dump, you really need to know if there is a supressor or
not. The difference is huge.

Best regards,
Luis

2018-11-26 18:40 GMT+01:00, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>:
> Hi John,
>
> Op 26-11-18 om 17:56 schreef John Doty:
>> Lots of info out there, google "load dump protection”.
>
> Ah, great, thanks! I never heard of this phrase before (hey, that's why
> I asked here) -- this really helps!
>
> Right away, I see that quite a bit of extra protection is in order --
> but it was a prototype anyway.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Best regards,
>
> Richard Rasker
>
>
>
>