X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 18:17:22 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it? the EDA ecosystem) + help needed In-Reply-To: <20170217170613.GA18595@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20170216183850 DOT GB14699 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20170217170613 DOT GA18595 AT localhost DOT localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> Unfortunately I couldn't decode whether you will or will not join the actual >> tEDAx implementation effort from the lepton side. >> >> A simple "yes" or "no" is sufficient. > > Rather "yes" than "no", when/if we'll get a request to > implement this. Not now, anyway, when things are in flux. Thank you.