X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:46:07 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it?
 the EDA ecosystem) + help needed
In-Reply-To: <CAJXU7q9GVwZ0eGDzeECh9qQec8MOgpXcCQz6aac+nsq5mmOmBA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1702171042400.7286@igor2priv>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702130818300 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702160811400 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702161842490 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20170216183850 DOT GB14699 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <CAJXU7q9mH_Z8qfJ-f7Ec=TY++K56tujC9Ve9jXcGtbeB4ss3GA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702170410040 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <CAJXU7q9GVwZ0eGDzeECh9qQec8MOgpXcCQz6aac+nsq5mmOmBA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>
>
>On 17 Feb 2017 03:25, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>
>Finally, why I started to write this mail: I'd like to make statistics
>for the tEDAx web page so I'd like to ask you the same boring question
>for pcb mainline: "yes" or "no" (to this specific thing)? This could
>also cut this thread short.
>
>
>For me, yes - why not.. looks like a sensible enough netlist import format,
>and costs us little to implement. (At some point)

Thank you!

FYI, next tEDAx goal is defining a very simple footprint block. Please let 
me know if you want to join in the design phase.

>Ultimately, it is not my decision of course. The somewhat related questions
>of who will implement it and when are ones I don't currently have answers
>for.

No worries. We don't have deadlines on any of these.

(The only timing issue was that I wanted to avoid ideas getting blocked 
before they born)

Best regards,

Igor2