X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=r+5opHFfyJXKf63WYgQQKXmljZCRTAXtULSK/sy806M=;
        b=YDEp1ZSHkaVjMOuJiuy5i/wTf2wR7zk3xm9wOdzBKzJxdbK+byspp5MhoHzG1TNUGY
         VF+ALGPVu/4VSjDvpUx+De5QR+GRC5d4jbkTqDQDqax+ivqIiF3YMeeOFlOY0JjR59tx
         Lf/J1OWqgT8xU5cnDzIsilzs6iDHz2KTUFeNNPwN9Rpava73D8FFt2LPk5vJgyIvOsit
         PUiWje1pTdAgYIWghza1u475rIGL8PzsTAWH79msiP9myl59EHI9lV6nuxT4a5cKZKt6
         Yi4Q/pdaNUR2XheIJAsJ0aZr7Pcsvmo9BYIctsyTzU9Fq9Ybfg5u5Sol/gIBE8d3jIw0
         ohWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
         :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=r+5opHFfyJXKf63WYgQQKXmljZCRTAXtULSK/sy806M=;
        b=Ni8QHSJRwD3K0PGA0Fuco/8/+nGdUKZCZLJxTVO8wjL+7Bako2TC4chywgnt0Gf54w
         Z/yF5WTcEtYAtbp4iOpcoMRDq2YU8a4LvQ/ciHclHLGLISV9nK18gMLgI9D9qMTtG3Zo
         09hIyJ8Ajv7S0iL5w4CtXY6Jspa8TS+Wcc9hTvFIXyYeA9vHMMhhLghiAnOQ7sFhzoyF
         fo01mXGQFHybxyP4LN1oAMc9TCg3KtBaHKuBcGOlV7Sa6a1w0F98692AJqm7HiPce26E
         i3d7To/SPfvnfHEs19B6EazzLBTZ+TtNZDmQmKSErHoiY5UNYgNtEjiL2ooAgMluK08F
         VuWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k8aqWAvZjEViygR/Pw+aQcf85Y4hIs+eW0fNt5/BkKQOrDum6xqeRndxpZ29r+XA==
X-Received: by 10.25.196.197 with SMTP id u188mr1031658lff.180.1487269553944;
        Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:25:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:25:48 +0100
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it?
 the EDA ecosystem) + help needed
Message-Id: <20170216192548.636c474e2c3fe341d10c7422@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1702161842490.7286@igor2priv>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702130818300 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702160811400 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	<20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702161842490 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > Ah, I see you're reimplementing json and such...
> 
> Which point made you think that?
> 
> Facts:
> 
> - the whole parser impelemntaion is about 60 lines of C code (I can't 
> believe JSON and such goes that low)
> 
> - 0 external dependencies

I agree, about 60 lines of C code and 0 external depencies must be really good.