X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20170214192219.15876.qmail@rahul.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:22:19 -0800 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] We are about to alienate users was -> geda-gaf fork In-Reply-To: References: <5cfb4f73-3c77-e8e2-b838-840f8ea43879 AT iae DOT nl> <7276b7ff-d4af-64cf-2906-f656369f8f85 AT iae DOT nl> <5d312c0b-00a5-c81b-8743-893fca16a54d AT wellesley DOT edu> <72dfc784-9b2e-b23b-20ae-f3e7ab8f2ae3 AT neurotica DOT com> <1A5289DF-3E47-43EB-8E2D-B9185F78187B AT noqsi DOT com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 23.4.1 From: conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] writes: > > But even if I'd gotten KiCAD running, I'd still have the huge of > investment of time and effort I've put into gEDA+PCB, plus the learning > curve of a new software package, plus the un-learning of all the > keystrokes etc that have become automatic for me over a decade and a > half. I'm a busy person; that's a show-stopper for me. > I agree, Dave. I too have a huge investement in resources and time in gEDA+PCB, and backward compatability is a very significant issue for me. John -- John Conover, conover AT rahul DOT net, http://www.johncon.com/