X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RHZK/GPozz5ZbcAQ8Hsccq59b1IPRDaVL8aHOr7hTfI=; b=kdw+NglbsVxsd1s2yjY4vrra3zT5uYX67GGni60WLkYHdczAC/DNYIu5rbrPQ+CAHO hl+wmBqf1uJpdo7xCoE7oVQ5gPUrdLEd0yb6HbC7qjwS4EiVWkkP8VGpcm8FdeMSnPKr PBg4yEGxQeQib9C1Iz87pSMkiB7qoTCgRdLLcV+I92Ur+xGdc+qFFw6MSIQ1hoVh8wgb 5CaseNq8dCISCVnAXTK/dY7l3zNel5j+oKyhuy47XFDICHvHJ4nBZreLmskAULED20WS rfPnPJbj4mFtZCjjWxdnaYdsqkyTel4JfIduaf6inX0gcrT82KaaYU62oMR0mqUpX0n3 6dag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RHZK/GPozz5ZbcAQ8Hsccq59b1IPRDaVL8aHOr7hTfI=; b=kMM0SRlg8brQ77pTUrbJJdJvsP7nyrcb+/KvhgfrZ5S4Tx0PZP7aPWvy1YhUTk8Scr SkwPiIhWvfWYcx2iQjYJkUvuIvYZRKhsBRGlJoo+ocO7jcm01oDW3Z2jc6djuBmegQlR HkJMHD2Ol0tPIynJkPuu/lzaqyIHYjyE4boDU0aYyqzIxaOURrdkAFIL8fceO8F3Puhk S7MFAp8tWmMg0sISKE1hJghH5iAbZ2KKEzl/0VuJP6Fmj6olF85xLLFp1YoWIyPD9dsv hnmqRZAXMoVjO3mHr+QPASwIzCLGwMsKclpfKGLNNbRHtJgZ+Bk+R6hTsBKfjHvy9/Sw MJ/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mlf++zrAzA1IalJDADVdeaU0QUg8n7h4WCBKOvgogmS4rpqv7xx1iHyqLqoF+MwA== X-Received: by 10.46.80.89 with SMTP id v25mr917243ljd.117.1486846683209; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:58:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:58:00 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gnetlist chaos Message-ID: <20170211205800.GB14489@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <0D03FED9-A309-4F6C-9863-0EC6DB35176D AT noqsi DOT com> <20170211182330 DOT GO21523 AT foo DOT stuge DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:56:39PM -0700, John Doty wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > > > > >> as far as I can tell, nobody else understands it well enough to > >> write a back end, unlike gnetlist proper. > > > > How do you think that could change? > > Well, gnetlist had, from the beginning, multiple people contributing back ends. But for years, others have complained they couldn’t contribute because of Scheme. Where are they? Is this new thing actually any more comprehensible than gnetlist to non-schemers? We won't win here, John. People who really contribute, still send their patches directly to me or on launchpad. You can see activity in mainline for the last half a year and come to a conclusion. Sadly, but nobody of the devs who worked on geda-gaf before want to continue there. -- Vladimir