X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=) To: "Britton Kerin \(britton.kerin\@gmail.com\) \[via geda-user\@delorie.com\]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] The nature of gEDA layers References: <201601261804 DOT u0QI4KEQ009550 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160126233332 DOT dec2f06f5c74354a3841989c AT gmail DOT com> <20160127091746 DOT 1c7a976c2752f913921688ac AT gmail DOT com> <20160127141334 DOT c738feb9dbeb54a7dec3dff8 AT gmail DOT com> <56A8F74B DOT 8080304 AT ecosensory DOT com> <56A961BC DOT 3040405 AT ecosensory DOT com> <56A9E416 DOT 8080500 AT ecosensory DOT com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:08:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Britton Kerin's message of "Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:28:08 -0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" writes: > It's highly unlikely it'll be easier for just BBVias. I believe > there's already an experimental branch that implements them. Igor is > likely to decide to implement them again while we all talk about it. > For containers to pay off several other applications for them would > need to exist and be important enough to get implemented. What are > they? My use cases for a mor egeneralized data model: - pad stacks, with differnet pad sizes on middle layers - hierarchical layout - rigid-flex baords with more than two outer layers To avoid more spagetti special casing in the future for all kinds of use cases. -- Stephan