X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=c9TU+yQPYtDl0iXoFHgU1J/4SR4cq5NA2EaSem8IUIE=; b=dLNfWkDTQUqlpPu16bC8vwLNbWWBnvy0fSKI4LZPiHxVHwpl7sCg85sYRAKekI3MzZ VE4dVNODsLoBGDXf7Gx4MYFiHl8Mw6jxz7pm7GWvfmDyTIR3j7WID5unLgZ3TeQJC9dU sH+MxyVCaHX3G1kV5JdL2bhuwWIgFKAETWWV00Q9tf/UvWloD+u1mHyJnhcse51dVQt6 mD03JydFQxIXL8473kl/r6n6j7Fj5lhXGXjmgl+Mm4BQe4fCsw6GpFONP6W0OSPylTJJ Yuh9IUOgNIivo9RsRlGqLgtGDJPb2lwVXuK71V6QlqvIbbLPEwV2rKCfh+wOd5AJ9Mhc JDwg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.55.4 with SMTP id n4mr8316053igp.64.1452166983905; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 03:43:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:43:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] A new PCB file format From: "Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b9b493b09fe0528bcf941 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --e89a8f3b9b493b09fe0528bcf941 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 DJ, http://wiki.geda-project.org/ Can 'we' have write access to the wiki? I've never in my life edited a wiki page. Can you give me some pointers how to do that? A place where we store the ideas, conclusions and suggestions would be nice. Lev On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Levente wrote: > This is a good idea, however, I think only some sort of socket between > gpcb and gschem would be enough. But I don't want to do the design right > away. > > Lev > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> Hi Everybody, >> >> If your looking at tuning up or otherwise redesigning the file format for >> PCB >> I would really like gschem to understand the PCB file format and >> visa-versa. >> What I would like to be able to do is have a PCB layout up at the same >> time I >> have the schematic for that design up in gschem. If I select any part or >> portion >> of the layout in PCB that part or portion is visually highlighted in >> gschem and >> visa-versa. >> >> This ability could possibly be used as the starting point for introducing >> boundary scan and other sophisticated usages of interconnects into gEDA. >> I am >> thinking verification, design for test, diagnostics and such. In my >> world, completing >> a design does not retire a project and it would be nice if gEDA reflected >> this dynamic. >> >> Regards >> >> Marvin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --e89a8f3b9b493b09fe0528bcf941 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Can 'we' ha= ve write access to the wiki? I've never in my life edited a wiki page. = Can you give me some pointers how to do that? A place where we store the id= eas, conclusions and suggestions would be nice.

Lev



On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Levente <= leventelist AT gmai= l.com> wrote:
This is a good idea, however, I think only some sort of socket bet= ween gpcb and gschem would be enough. But I don't want to do the design= right away.

Lev

On Thu, Jan 7= , 2016 at 6:20 AM, Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT d= elorie.com> wrote:
Hi Everybody,

If your looking at tuning up or o= therwise redesigning the file format for PCB
I would really like = gschem to understand the PCB file format and visa-versa.
What I w= ould like to be able to do is have a PCB layout up at the same time I
=
have the schematic for that design up in gschem. If I select any part = or portion
of the layout in PCB that part or portion is visually = highlighted in gschem and
visa-versa.=C2=A0

<= div>This ability could possibly be used as the starting point for introduci= ng
boundary scan and other sophisticated usages of interconnects = into gEDA. I am=C2=A0
thinking verification, design for test, dia= gnostics and such. In my world, completing
a design does not reti= re a project and it would be nice if gEDA reflected this dynamic.

Regards

<= div>Marvin








--e89a8f3b9b493b09fe0528bcf941--