X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:18:48 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Merging stuff. How to make it happen
In-Reply-To: <568DFDAD.3040700@iee.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1601070714380.9035@igor2priv>
References: <CAC4O8c_p5bMB1cKzDEsQFSnbZvY3TgnczH94pO_qCoJmiv2iWQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q9rMcQpLU5020RoZTqskT4moOS6f3Ugw+g3_mhO565MLg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c-nPx1isS2DA4=X1vQFVY51vQ6pAY6sSfHBMog_m0_2dg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q8jLiY2oAGmkgfXfzdNoAg2xVRx8bxgAXyF_qqYs=9Dgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAC4O8c8=Vh7DcVrdrG4GE7ssBNG_VuxDLw2JSyg=Bv7Lnvfysg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q-iNx7PVbZHe_SC+VGs1SN-zOSPEyQjBc6CS2qD8wnpvw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c8sm-jp7+jvV_QJ9Zskwb31JsmPUA+BY2UkUMg31_Htsg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q_K3xSdNWaZy3AZ_zCCAGWjvasc8TrJYrD5xz-CZujYDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <20160106192411 DOT 7d9fd782 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160106190750 DOT 32335 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAJXU7q_A8eFsFdZ5yGercSs5SNPjwz81qc3ArH4jtOV=o-VO_g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601070551580 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <568DFDAD DOT 3040700 AT iee DOT org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> I think you should propose a change (of reformatting code) .. and let it
> 'sink' in .. and generate discussion .. and then set an appropriate
> release/milestone to achieve by. Coders can therefore share the burden
> amongst them, to achieve the goal, and Voila, you have code conforming
> to a 'standard' you're agreed on :)

This sounds like a perfect flamewar material, lol

Disclaimer: I do NOT propose applying my preferred format on mainline pcb, 
I merely share it upon the above request. This mail has nothing to do with 
programming languages, scheme, file formats, integration, changing how 
geda works, etc.

indent --line-length128 -brs -br -nce --tab-size2 -ut -npsl  -npcs -hnl